Cy Twombly's approach to art-making was intuitive, literary, and deeply connected to place. Unlike many contemporaries who maintained consistent studio routines, Twombly worked in irregular bursts of activity, often triggered by emotional responses to poetry, mythology, or historical events. His primary studios in Rome and later Gaeta, Italy, were converted historic buildings that reflected his immersion in Mediterranean culture and aesthetics.
Twombly's technique was physically engaging and materially inventive. He often worked on the floor or against walls, using his whole body to create sweeping marks. His distinctive graffiti-like lines were produced by working from unusual positions—sometimes painting with his left hand (though right-handed) or gripping pencils with multiple fingers to achieve particular qualities of line. For paintings, he frequently used house paint thinned to create drips and runny surfaces, applying it with brushes, sticks, and fingers. Many works feature distinctive white backgrounds resembling ancient plaster or marble, achieved through multiple layers of paint mixed with gypsum.
What distinguishes Twombly's practice was his integration of drawing, writing, and painting. He erased as much as he added, creating palimpsest-like surfaces where marks appear simultaneously ancient and immediate. Text fragments—names from classical mythology, poetic quotations, and place names—were incorporated as both visual elements and semantic references. Twombly rarely provided explanations for his work, allowing these cryptic inscriptions and gestural marks to generate meaning through suggestion rather than declaration.
Twombly's production evolved throughout his career, from the tighter, more graphite-heavy early works to increasingly chromatic and expansive late paintings. His sculptural works, though less known, employed similar strategies of assemblage and whitewashing to transform found objects into mysterious artifacts. Throughout his career, Twombly maintained an intimate scale of production, working without assistants and producing relatively few works compared to many contemporaries, each piece emerging from deeply personal engagement with history, literature, and place.